International Justice

Lack of accountability and rampant impunity for serious human rights violations, in particular crimes under international law, are among the triggers of recurrent conflicts and repeated cycles of violence, as well as of exacerbated grievances, abuse of power and low trust towards institutions. Fighting against impunity for international crimes and promoting international justice is therefore essential to uphold human rights and the rule of law and build sustainable peace.

Based on its expertise and experience documenting serious human rights violations, providing legal support to victims, reinforcing the capacities of civil society organisations and facilitating exchanges of experience, and defending a holistic, victim-centred, trauma-informed, intersectional approach to justice and accountability, FIDH pursues to (1) restore the rights of victims of serious human rights violations; (2) support the establishment, and the strengthening of more effective and meaningful accountability mechanisms at national, regional and international levels; and to (3) enhance commitments of decision makers to justice and accountability.

In partnership with eight other NGOs, FIDH is leading the "Global Initiative Against Impunity for International Crimes and Serious Human Rights Violations: Making Justice Work". Learn more on this civil-society led programme and consortium below.

Read more
  • International Criminal Court (ICC)

    The adoption of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) on 17 July 1998, which came into force on 1 July 2002, represented a historic step in the fight against impunity for perpetrators of the most serious crimes. It has now been ratified by two-thirds of the world’s States.

    Based in The Hague in the Netherlands, the ICC is a permanent, international criminal court with a universal vocation and the competence to exercise jurisdiction over those who have committed crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes, where the States concerned are incapable of pursuing these individuals themselves or are unwilling to do so. In addition, the Court has jurisdiction in cases where crimes have been committed on the territory or by nationals of States who have accepted its jurisdiction, or where cases are referred to it by the United Nations Security Council.

    For the first time in the history of international justice, victims are recognised as having the right to take part in proceedings and to obtain reparation. FIDH actively participated in setting up the ICC. It worked to secure ratification and implementation of its statute by the largest number of States. Through its permanent representation at the ICC in The Hague in particular, FIDH follows the ICC’s activities on a daily basis and contributes to the dialogue between civil society and the Court.

    FIDH also feeds into the preliminary analyses and investigations of the Office of the Prosecutor of the ICC by submitting, along with its member leagues in the countries concerned, communications on crimes committed in order to provide grounds for prosecutions by the Court.

    Lastly, FIDH pays particular attention to whether victims are able to effectively exercise their rights in Court proceedings.

    The growing importance of the ICC’s role and the extent of its mandate have also highlighted the challenges it faces, such as the lack of cooperation from States, the limited resources for the year-on-year rise in the number of situations under investigation, the yet-to-be-specified modalities for victim participation, representation and reparation and the difficulties with regard to raising the awareness and managing the expectations of the populations concerned.

  • Ad hoc and hybrid tribunals

    For twenty years, ad-hoc courts (for example the ICTY for ex-Yugoslavia and ICTR for Rwanda), ‘institutionalised’ courts such as the Special Court for Sierra Leone or Lebanon, as well as special tribunals or chambers in various countries such as East Timor, Kosovo and Cambodia, have been created to enable investigations and prosecutions in places where the national judicial systems do not permit them. These international or internationalised courts have, however, very precise, time-specific mandates; they are created as a mechanism for transitional justice following a conflict or particular event.

    FIDH has worked to see these courts set up and function effectively, and continues to work in this direction, for example in the creation of the Special Criminal Court in the Central African Republic.

    FIDH has also represented 10 civil parties, who were victims of crimes committed during the Khmer Rouge regime, in hearings before the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC).

  • Universal Jurisdiction

    Combating impunity for the most serious crimes also takes the form of recourse to national courts in other countries through universal or extraterritorial jurisdiction.

    This represents the last resort for victims when the courts in the countries where the crimes have been committed are ineffective and international courts do not have jurisdiction.

    When applying universal jurisdiction, a State puts on trial perpetrators of the most serious crimes committed in another country, in particular when these individuals are located in the territory of the State in question.

    FIDH works to ensure that States adopt laws to enable them to effectively prosecute crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, torture and forced disappearance, whatever the territory in which the crimes were committed, and to effectively exercise this jurisdiction.

    Equally, FIDH encourages the development of joint national policies and strategies and the creation and consolidation of centres of expertise within States. It also takes part in meetings of the European Network of Contact Points concerning individuals responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes.

    FIDH represents numerous victims in extraterritorial jurisdiction proceedings regarding crimes committed in, for example, Syria, Libya, Algeria and the Republic of Congo (Congo-Brazzaville), and has secured the conviction of those guilty of torture in Mauritania and Tunisia.

  • National courts

    Primary competence lies with the courts in the countries where the most serious crimes have been committed.

    FIDH seeks to consolidate the smooth administration of justice and the independent and impartial functioning of courts within the context of re-establishing the rule of law.

    Thus FIDH works to ensure that the most serious crimes are criminalised in national law and are effectively prosecuted at national level.

    FIDH directly supports victims of international crimes in their quest for justice and reparation and, on occasion, as an organisation assumes the status of civil party in national proceedings against perpetrators of the most serious crimes, notably in Guinea, Ivory Coast, Mali and Central African Republic.

  • The Global Initiative Against Impunity for International Crimes and Serious Human Rights Violations: Making Justice Work

    The “Global Initiative Against Impunity for International Crimes and Serious Human Rights Violations: Making Justice Work” is a consortium of eight civil society organisations (Civil Rights Defenders, European Centre for Constitutional and Human Rights, FIDH, lmpunity Watch, Parliamentarians for Global Action, REDRESS, TRIAL International, Women’s lnitiatives for Gender Justice) and the Coalition for the lnternational Criminal Court, co-funded by the European Union. It aims to contribute to the fight against impunity by supporting a comprehensive, integrated, and inclusive approach to justice and accountability for serious human rights violations and international crimes.

    • What is the Global Initiative Against Impunity?

    "The Global Initiative Against Impunity for International Crimes and Serious Human Rights Violations: Making Justice Work" Leaflet
    • Making Justice Work: Civil society unites in the global fight against impunity

    The Global Initiative Against Impunity started in December 2023 and was formally launched in June 2024 for an initial four-year period. Its first actions in 2024 had a special focus on 27 countries in Africa, the Americas, Asia, Europe, and the Middle East, but it seeks to improve the rule of law, accountability standards, and atrocity prevention globally.

    • Global Initiative Against Impunity knowledge management platform

    On 23 May 2025, EU Day against impunity, the Global Initiative Against Impunity is launching makingjusticework.org, the GIAI Knowledge Management Platform, an inclusive, multilingual digital clearing house for collaboration, learning, and information sharing.

News

Videos