In 1998, FIDH Palestinian partners launched an important campaign
for the implementation, in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPTs),
of the IVth Geneva Convention. This campaign is based on several resolutions
of the United Nations General Assembly which invite the Swiss government,
as the depository of the Convention, to convene a conference to investigate
measures to enforce the Convention in the Occupied Palestinian Territories
on 15th July 1999.
To achieve these goals, the PCHR (Palestinian Centre for Human Rights)
invited on 6th April 1999 a number of Palestinian, Arab and international
human rights organizations, as well as a number of individual human
rights activists who expressed their willingness to be partners in
the campaign, to meet in Geneva. This meeting coincided with the 55th
meeting of the UN Commission on Human Rights.
During the Geneva meeting, participants adopted a position paper pertaining
to grave breaches of the Convention, other breaches of the Convention,
and unilateral measures to change the status of parts of the Occupied
Territories.
POSITION PAPER
In its resolution
A/ES-10/L.5/Rev.1 of 8th February 1999, the United Nations General
Assembly recommended that the High Contracting Parties (HCPs) to the
Fourth Geneva Convention (the Convention) convene a conference
on measures to enforce this convention in the Occupied Palestinian
Territories, including Jerusalem, on 15th July 1999, at the United
Nations offices in Geneva. In so doing, it invited the Government
of Switzerland, in its capacity as the depositary of the Geneva Convention,
to undertake whatever preparations are necessary prior to the Conference.
It also requested the UN Secretary General to make the necessary facilities
available to enable the HCPs to convene the conference. It expressed
its confidence that Palestine, as a party directly concerned, will
participate in the above-mentioned conference.
The commitment of the HCPs to convene this conference was clearly
established when states adopted the above- mentioned resolution by
an overwhelming majority. The agreed focus of the conference is measures
to be taken to ensure full implementation of the Convention.
To ensure that such a conference takes place, the Palestinian Centre
for Human Rights (PCHR) took the initiative to launch a campaign on
6th April 1999 entitled : A campaign to implement the Convention
in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT). A number of Palestinian,
Arab and international human rights organizations as well as human
rights experts (the participants) adopted a plan of action to call
upon the HCPs convene a conference in accordance with the General
Assembly resolution and to adopt concrete and specific measures for
the implementation of the Convention in the OPT.
The participants emphasized that the implementation of the Convention
is a minimum requirement for the protection and safeguard of civilians,
particularly at the end of this interim period. They also stressed
that a Conference on the 15th of July that respects the provisions
of the General Assembly resolution will be essential to a comprehensive,
just and lasting peace between Palestine and Israel. The participants
identified the following three categories that merit action by the
HCPs. During the Conference, practical measures should be adopted
to address these categories in order to ensure full implementation
of the Convention :
1. Grave breaches of the Convention
Grave breaches of the Convention, such as torture or inhuman treatment
and the taking of hostages, constitute war crimes. The HCPs are under
a legal obligation, in accordance with article 146 of the Convention,
to search for persons alleged to have committed or to have ordered
to be committed such grave breaches and to bring them, regardless
of their nationality, before their own courts. Specific measures should
be taken to ensure that this obligation is fulfilled.
2. Other breaches of the Convention
Other serious breaches of the Convention include the establishment
of Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, including
Jerusalem. The establishment of settlements is illegal according to
Article 49 of the Convention, as has been repeatedly confirmed by
UN resolutions.
3. Unilateral measures to change the status of parts of the Occupied
Territories.
Unilateral measures to change the status of parts of the Occupied
Territories, including de jure and de facto annexation, are illegal
according to the Convention. HCPs should not take measures that will
lead to illegality.
In the circumstances, the participants urge the HCPs to focus the
agenda of the Conference on specific measures to be adopted to stop
the above-mentioned breaches. The overall objective of the Conference
must be to ensure compliance with the Convention. In this regard,
reference is made to the decision by the European Commission recommending
that its Member States not import goods produced in the Israeli settlements.
The participants look forward to the HCPs adopting similar constructive
measures at the Conference. By so doing, the HCPs will remove a serious
obstacle in the way of true conciliation between Israelis and Palestinians.
To this end, the participants, as part of civil society, commit themselves
to support the HCPs in the implementation of the Convention.
Signatories
:
Palestinian
Centre for Human Rights
Al-Haq
International Federation of Human Rights
International Commission of Jurists
International Commission of Jurists Sweden
Robert F. Kennedy Memorial Center for Human Rights
Middle East Watch
Arab Organization for Human Rights
Arab Lawyers Union
Arab Working Group for Human Rights Defenders
Morocco Organization for Human Rights
Abdel Rahman Abu El-Nasser, Chairperson of the Palestinian BAR
Association
Agneta Johansson, Sweden
Greg Nott, South Africa
Paul de Waart, the Netherlands
Amnesty International, Swiss Section (observer)
The Jerusalem Center for Legal Aid
The Palestinian Independent Commission for Citizens Rights
LAW, the Palestinian Society for the Protection of Human Rights
and the Environment
Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies.
(From La Lettre n° 15 of April 29)