| A Call to the
European Union and the Council of Europe
Embargo: 21 may
Paris 19 May 2003- The FIDH has a longstanding position of
opposition to the death penalty, and therefore started a series
of missions in countries still practicing this form of punishment.
In October 2002, a mission went to Japan in order to investigate
the conditions in which death row inmates are judged and detained.
The results of this mission have been published in English,
French and Japanese in the mission report entitled, The Death
Penalty in Japan, A Practice Unworthy of a Democracy.
The conclusions drawn up raise major concern: since 1993, 43
prisoners have been sentenced to death in Japan without any
public reaction, and another 56 prisoners condemned to death
are on death row, awaiting execution.
Despite the Japanese Federation of Bar Associations’
efforts towards improving the defence system, Japanese prisoners
– especially those sentenced to death – do not receive
a fair trial.
The Daiyo Kangoku practice is one amongst several practices
which allows suspects to be detained in police stations for
23 days, contravening the rules of a fair trial. Confessions,
which can be obtained through strong pressure, give police the
basis for accusation. Therefore judicial errors occur quite
frequently at the beginning of this first phase of the procedure.
Furthermore, the conditions on death row themselves amount
to cruel, inhuman and degrading treatments: Once the death sentence
has been delivered, the prisoner is held in solitary confinement.
Detainees have extremely limited contact with families and lawyers
and meetings are closely monitored. Above all, prisoners live
with the constant fear of never knowing if today will be their
last day. The prisoner is informed that the execution will take
place on the very same day, and family members are notified
the following day. The Ministry of Justice signs the execution
order and is supposed to intervene within six months following
the finalisation of the sentence. However, in practice, this
rule is never abided by and certain death row detainees have
spent several decades behind bars asking themselves each morning
if they would be hanged that day. This was the case for Sakae
Menda who spent 34 years of his life behind bars before being
acquitted. The FIDH recall that long isolation periods violate
article 7 and 10 of the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights.
Capital punishment in Japan completely contradicts current
International Law evolution, which is working evermore towards
abolition of the death penalty or at least towards obtaining
a universal moratorium on executions.
The secrecy surrounding executions coupled with the absence
of debate in the Japanese media keeps this practice alive. In
Japan, the parliamentary coalition for the abolition of the
death penalty must be supported for in its campaign towards
abolition, which includes setting up a two-year moratorium along
with a law abolishing capital punishment.
On the International front, hope comes from the intergovernmental
and regional organs, and especially from the discussions between
the UE and Japan. In this regard, The FIDH regrets that the
Joint Statement issued at the end of the 12th EU-Japan Summit
does not mention the issue of death penalty in Japan. The FIDH
recalls that, as defined by the EU guidelines on the death penalty
adopted by the EU in June 1998 and by the General Affairs Council
of June 2001 on the relations between the EU and third party
states, the issue of human rights and death penalty should be
raised systematically during such Summits. Hence, the FIDH asks
the European Union to systematically include the issue of death
penalty in its dialogue with Japan, at all levels.
The FIDH is also asking the Council of Europe, considering
that over the last 2 years, Japan has not reacted effectively
to the calls of the Council of Europe, to decide the suspension
of the observer status for a renewable period of 1 year, and
to propose the development, in Japan, of specific programs aiming
at promoting abolition, on the occasion of the next session
of the Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly, to be held
on 23-27 June 2002. |