| Paris
- December 10, 2001
On last
September 25, less than 15 days after the terrorist attacks
on New York and Washington, the Bush administration sent a letter
to the ultra conservative Senator Jesse Helms to notify its
support to the anti-ICC proposal. This proposal aims to prohibit
all military assistance to the States which have ratified the
Rome Statute creating the future Court that will have jurisdiction
to prosecute individuals suspected of war crimes, crimes against
humanity and genocide.
No one could ignore that the proposal entitled "American
Servicemembers' Protection Act" (ASPA) existed as the sword
of Damocles over the American Congress. Since the United States'
opposition noticed the day of the vote of the Rome Statute,
no one could as well ignore that they will act to set up guarantees
that no American nationals can be tried before the ICC.
Even if the ASPA still has to be voted by the House of Representatives
before being implemented by President Bush, the Senators did
the first step towards impunity of American nationals by adopting
the act by 78 votes to 21.
When the United States call for a full coalition against international
terrorism and launch a united offensive against Afghanistan,
they show, once more, the ambiguity and the incoherence of their
foreign policy.
This is even more regrettable with regard to the fact that the
entry into force of the ICC is luckily a matter of months, with
or without the United States!
Press Contact: (33-1) 43 55 25 18
Background of the ASPA
The American
Servicemembers' Protection Act (ASPA) was presented on May 8-9,
2001 respectively before the House of Representatives and the
Senate by Mr Delay and Mr Helms. In substance, this act:
1. Would prohibit any kind of American co-operation with the
ICC.
2. Would prohibit any kind of military assistance with most
of the States which have ratified the Rome Statute: as a general
principle, the act states that, one year after the date on which
the Rome Statute enters into force, no United States military
assistance may be provided to the government of a country that
is party to the ICC. However, the President may waive the prohibition
to a particular country if he determines that it is important
to the national interest of the United States. Thus, the non-assistance
clause is not applicable to NATO member States, to essential
allies even not NATO members (such as Australia, Egypt, Israel,
Japan, Jordan, Argentina, the Republic of Korea, New Zealand)
as well as Taiwan.
3. Would restrict information communication dealing with national
security to States that have ratified the ICC Statute.
4. Would oppose to the American participation to UN peace keeping
operations: It is stipulated that the President should use the
voice and vote of the United States in the UN Security Council
to ensure that each resolution of the Security Council authorising
any peacekeeping operation under Chapter VI of the charter of
the United Nations or peace enforcement operation under the
chapter VII of the charter of the United Nations permanently
exempts, at a minimum, members of the Armed Forces of the United
States participating in such operation from criminal prosecution
or other assertion of jurisdiction by the International Criminal
Court for actions undertaken by such personnel in connection
with the operation. The participation of American Armed forces
would be allowed only if it occurs on the territory of a non
State party.
5. Would allow the president to use "all means necessary
and appropriate " to bring about the release of any person
who is being detained or imprisoned by or at the request of
the ICC, hence nicknamed: "Hague Invasion Act".
House leadership
holds UN arrears repayment hostage in effort to force adoption
of the ASPA
During the summer 2001 and until the events of 11 September,
the congressmen at the origin of the act decide to tie the authorisation
of the Senate concerning the payment of the American dues vis-à-vis
the United Nations to the anti-ICC act. Immediately after, Kofi
Annan, the UN Secretary-General demanded the United States to
separate the two issues and not to take in hostage the payment
of their contribution. On September 13, in the wake of last
week's terrorist attack, House leaders have dropped their demand
that the Helms-DeLay American Servicemembers' Protection Act
(ASPA) be attached to any legislation that would authorize the
release of $582 million in arrears to the UN. However, the ASPA
is still in play!
The Bush
government supports a revised ASPA legislation
On September 10, the anti-ICC act is revised to include presidential
prerogatives permitting to lift some of the prohibitions provided
by the ASPA. The Bush Administration sent a letter to Helms
on September 25, which indicates their support for the revised
version of ASPA in the amendment.
However, The current amendment is only slightly revised from
its prior form. Much broader waivers are included for the President,
which would allow him to lift certain prohibitions. Thus, the
articles dealing with the prohibition to co-operate and to provide
information relating to national security would be non applicable
when the president, on a case by case basis, decide to act as
Commander in chief of the Armed forces of the United States.
Similarly, the restrictions to the participation of the American
Armed forces to the peacekeeping operations and the prohibition
to provide military assistance to the States which have ratified
the ICC could be suspended by the president for one year. To
do so, the President will have to make sure that the ICC will
not have jurisdiction on American nationals and that they will
not be arrested, detained nor jailed.
The time period of one year could be renewable if the president
determines and reports to the Congress that the country has
entered into an agreement with the United State preventing the
ICC from proceeding against United States personnel present
in such country.
28 November
2001, the ASPA progresses
On Wednesday, November 28, President Bush signed into law H.R.
2500, the Departments of Commerce, Justice, State, the Judiciary,
and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2002. This legislation
contains an amendment, Section 630 proposed by Senator Larry
Craig (R-ID), that prohibits the use of appropriated funds for
cooperation with, or assistance or other support to, the International
Criminal Court (ICC) or its Preparatory Commission.
Upon signing, President Bush issued a signing statement which
contained the following paragraphs on Section 630 (the Craig
Amendment) and on other sections of the act:
"While section 630 clearly reflects that the Congress agrees
with my Administration that it is not in the interests of the
United States to become a party to the ICC treaty, I must note
that this provision must be applied consistent with my constitutional
authority in the area of foreign affairs, which, among other
things, will enable me to take actions to protect U.S. nationals
from the purported jurisdiction of the treaty.
"In addition, several other provisions of the Act unconstitutionally
constrain my authority regarding the conduct of diplomacy and
my authority as Commander in Chief. I will apply these provisions
consistent with my constitutional responsibilities."
This statement
indicates that the President has chosen to interpret the Craig
amendment as not prohibiting U.S. negotiation at the Preparatory
Commission meetings of the ICC.
|