Given that the process of economic globalisation has not only severely undermined the sovereignty and right to self-determination of peoples but has also been accompanied by the gradual and increasing deterioration of the environment and of the human rights situation in general;
Given that, in particular, the model of development characterized by extraction of natural resources, along with the exploitation of hydrocarbons and open pit mining have contributed to the destruction of biodiversity in many places, contaminating rivers, lagoons and seas, affecting the rights of native communities and democratic governance in many areas, countries and regions;
Given that a “race to the bottom” is under way, seeking to reduce resources exploitation or production costs in contravention of the International Labour Organisation (ILO) fundamental conventions, ILO Convention 169 and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, and also affecting the environmental norms that protect communities and peoples;
Given that this is affecting the right to food,contributing to deforestation with the expansion of agro-fuel crops, which further threatens peoples’ food security and sovereignty;
Given that these economic activities are frequently linked to measures taken to criminalise legitimate social protest;
Given that free trade agreements are playing a part in guaranteeing companies’ interests over and above the environment and human rights, establishing greater legal security for investment or trade than for individuals or peoples. In particular, this affects rights such as the right to health, the right to food and the rights of indigenous peoples or those of African descent while also undermining the right to development enshrined in the United Nations Declaration of 1986;
Given that the rights of all migrant workers and their families are permanently and more severely affected and compromised by the economic crisis, and that the very large majority of developed countries have not ratified the Convention that obliges them to protect these people’s rights;
Given that this type of practice continues with almost absolute impunity either because there are no regulations that sanction or prevent theseor because, although the legal obligation to respect these rights does exist, it does not result in effective sanctioning of the perpetrators or reparation for the victims;
The International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) Congress calls upon:







Business and Human Rights - Updated version: Corporate Accountability for Human Rights Abuses: A Guide for Victims and NGOs on Recourse Mechanisms