The current discussion about revising Jordan’s constitution offers a unique opportunity to strengthen human rights. A basic starting point should be the constitutional affirmation that the kingdom’s international treaty obligations take precedence over domestic law, a principle court rulings have already acknowledged. Such an affirmation in the constitution would encourage Jordanian judges, prosecutors, law enforcement officers, and lawyers, to refer to provisions of international law, in particular, international human rights law, in the judicial process. Jordanian judges have already occasionally mentioned international human rights law, for example the Convention on the Rights of the Child, but there is much room for strengthening the domestic judicial process’s compatibility with Jordan’s international obligations. Furthermore, inclusion in the constitution of the supremacy of international treaty law over domestic law would encourage and guide revisions of domestic law to close gaps with and remove contradictions to, international human rights law.
The constitution should also be amended to include other basic principles of law with important effects on human rights. One area requiring improvement is extending the applicability of the constitution to all persons under Jordanian jurisdiction, including non-Jordanians – as required by the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights – except for certain political rights, such as some rights related to the participation in public affairs. There should be no discrimination, for example, in the right to freedom of expression, between a Jordanian and a non-Jordanian resident of the kingdom. Another, related area, is the right to non-discrimination, and to equality before the law. Non-discrimination on the basis of sex, race, religion, and national or social origin is a basic principle to which Jordan has already subscribed by virtue of its international obligations. A constitutional provision enshrining non-discrimination as a principle of domestic law could serve in particular women who remain disadvantaged under current Jordanian laws, for example, in personal status, and in passing on their nationality to their children.
We also recommend including references to the rights to work, education, health, and social security. Currently, the constitution provides only for the right to work, but Jordan’s international obligations under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, carry with them state duties for the progressive realization of these rights. A constitutional provision could guide lawmakers and government officials in the formulation of specific laws and policies addressing those rights.
Your committee is already considering constitutional changes resulting from recommendations made by the national dialogue committee regarding new election and political party laws. We commend a proposed change to include an independent electoral commission under judicial supervision, and further urge that the constitution reference the international right to periodic, free, and fair elections. Currently, the fairness of elections is not adequately guaranteed, namely the vote of one elector is not equal to the vote of another. In Jordan, electoral districts have vastly unequal numbers of voters. The Human Rights Committee, which monitors state compliance with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), has interpreted the right to participate in public affairs to provide for the equality of each person’s vote: “The drawing of electoral boundaries and the method of allocating votes should not distort the distribution of voters or discriminate against any group and should not exclude or restrict unreasonably the right of citizens to choose their representatives freely” (General Comment No. 25 on article 25 of the ICCPR).
Lastly, we urge the committee to strengthen the independence of the judiciary. To that end, Jordan should abolish the special courts the constitution currently allows. The State Security Court, one such special court to which the prime minister may refer any case and whose majority of judges are military officers appointed by their superiors, lacks independence. The Police Court is another special court that tries members of the Public Security Department, including when they are charged with abusing civilians, such as when a prison guard beats a detainee. The police chief appoints the Police Court’s prosecutors and judges, who are all members of the Public Security Department. These courts are difficult to reconcile with the principle of an independent judiciary, which is necessary to uphold the right to a fair trial. Constitutional guarantees of the principles and rights described above would greatly benefit Jordan’s democratic reforms.
In consultation with civil society organizations, constitutional reforms should:
We thank you for your time and attention. Yours sincerely,









